Retraction Watch – Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

• https://retractionwatch.com/
• https://retractionwatch.com/help-us-heres-some-of-what-were-working-on/
• https://retractionwatch.com/support-retraction-watch/
• https://retractionwatch.com/meet-the-retraction-watch-staff/
• https://retractionwatch.com/meet-the-retraction-watch-staff/about-adam-marcus/
• https://retractionwatch.com/meet-the-retraction-watch-staff/about/
• https://retractionwatch.com/privacy-policy/
• https://retractionwatch.com/retraction-watch-database-user-guide/
• https://retractionwatch.com/retraction-watch-database-user-guide/retraction-watch-database-user-guide-appendix-a-fields/
• https://retractionwatch.com/retraction-watch-database-user-guide/retraction-watch-database-user-guide-appendix-b-reasons/
• https://retractionwatch.com/retraction-watch-database-user-guide/retraction-watch-database-user-guide-appendix-c-article-types/
• https://retractionwatch.com/the-center-for-scientific-integrity/
• https://retractionwatch.com/the-center-for-scientific-integrity/board-of-directors/
• https://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-faq/
• https://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-faq/transparencyindex/
• https://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-leaderboard/
• https://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-leaderboard/top-10-most-highly-cited-retracted-papers/
• https://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-store/
• https://retractionwatch.com/see-retraction-watch-live-upcoming-appearances/
• https://retractionwatch.com/what-people-are-saying-about-retraction-watch/
• http://www.retractionwatch.com/feed/
• http://retractionwatch.com/
• http://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/15/weekend-reads-how-much-is-integrity-worth-killing-the-science-poster-future-of-megajournals-in-doubt/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/15/weekend-reads-how-much-is-integrity-worth-killing-the-science-poster-future-of-megajournals-in-doubt/#comment-1688807
• https://retractionwatch.com/2016/11/22/journal-editor-resigns-over-firestorm-from-circumcision-article/#comment-1688711
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/11/permeable-to-bad-science-journal-retracts-paper-hailed-by-proponents-of-homeopathy/#comment-1688683
• https://www.facebook.com/pages/Retraction-Watch/119209094864356
• https://twitter.com/retractionwatch
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/15/weekend-reads-how-much-is-integrity-worth-killing-the-science-poster-future-of-megajournals-in-doubt/
• https://www.paypal.com/us/fundraiser/charity/1909130
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/12/want-to-check-for-retractions-in-your-personal-library-and-get-alerts-for-free-now-you-can/?fbclid=IwAR0IQke928RO18z-20ZfEgnHO-zmSknlfFEi4uDmzjSpr5sKE1gF-FiicRc
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/15/weekend-reads-how-much-is-integrity-worth-killing-the-science-poster-future-of-megajournals-in-doubt/#more-100764
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/15/weekend-reads-how-much-is-integrity-worth-killing-the-science-poster-future-of-megajournals-in-doubt/?share=email
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/15/weekend-reads-how-much-is-integrity-worth-killing-the-science-poster-future-of-megajournals-in-doubt/?share=facebook
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/15/weekend-reads-how-much-is-integrity-worth-killing-the-science-poster-future-of-megajournals-in-doubt/?share=twitter
• https://retractionwatch.com/author/ivanoransky/
• https://retractionwatch.com/category/weekend-reads/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/15/weekend-reads-how-much-is-integrity-worth-killing-the-science-poster-future-of-megajournals-in-doubt/#comments
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/14/forensics-friday-notice-anything-odd-about-this-figure/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2018/06/17/meet-the-scientific-sleuths-ten-whove-had-an-impact-on-the-scientific-literature/
• http://jbcresources.asbmb.org/
• https://www.asbmb.org/asbmbtoday/collections/DueDiligence/
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJZM9IkqQL0&t=1s
• https://retractionwatch.com/category/forensics-friday/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/14/forensics-friday-notice-anything-odd-about-this-figure/#more-100127
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/14/forensics-friday-notice-anything-odd-about-this-figure/?share=email
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/14/forensics-friday-notice-anything-odd-about-this-figure/?share=facebook
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/14/forensics-friday-notice-anything-odd-about-this-figure/?share=twitter
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/14/forensics-friday-notice-anything-odd-about-this-figure/#respond
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/13/public-health-journal-retracts-paper-on-austerity-for-inaccurate-and-misleading-results/
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Assembly_Against_Austerity#/media/File:People's_assembly_20150620.jpg
• https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305075?af=R
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/13/public-health-journal-retracts-paper-on-austerity-for-inaccurate-and-misleading-results/#more-100094
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/13/public-health-journal-retracts-paper-on-austerity-for-inaccurate-and-misleading-results/?share=email
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/13/public-health-journal-retracts-paper-on-austerity-for-inaccurate-and-misleading-results/?share=facebook
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/13/public-health-journal-retracts-paper-on-austerity-for-inaccurate-and-misleading-results/?share=twitter
• https://retractionwatch.com/author/amarcus41/
• https://retractionwatch.com/category/by-journal/am-j-public-health/
• https://retractionwatch.com/category/by-country/spain/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/13/public-health-journal-retracts-paper-on-austerity-for-inaccurate-and-misleading-results/#comments
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/12/want-to-check-for-retractions-in-your-personal-library-and-get-alerts-for-free-now-you-can/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2014/12/15/retraction-watch-growing-thanks-400000-grant-macarthur-foundation/
• http://retractiondatabase.org
• https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/what-massive-database-retracted-papers-reveals-about-science-publishing-s-death-penalty
• http://zotero.org
• https://github.com/zotero
• https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/77711/available-for-beta-testing-retracted-paper-notifications
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/12/want-to-check-for-retractions-in-your-personal-library-and-get-alerts-for-free-now-you-can/#more-100285
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/12/want-to-check-for-retractions-in-your-personal-library-and-get-alerts-for-free-now-you-can/?share=email
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/12/want-to-check-for-retractions-in-your-personal-library-and-get-alerts-for-free-now-you-can/?share=facebook
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/12/want-to-check-for-retractions-in-your-personal-library-and-get-alerts-for-free-now-you-can/?share=twitter
• https://retractionwatch.com/category/rw-announcements/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/12/want-to-check-for-retractions-in-your-personal-library-and-get-alerts-for-free-now-you-can/#comments
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/11/permeable-to-bad-science-journal-retracts-paper-hailed-by-proponents-of-homeopathy/
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Poisonoak.jpg
• https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06967-0
• https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-31971-9
• https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-44557-w
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/11/permeable-to-bad-science-journal-retracts-paper-hailed-by-proponents-of-homeopathy/#more-100085
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/11/permeable-to-bad-science-journal-retracts-paper-hailed-by-proponents-of-homeopathy/?share=email
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/11/permeable-to-bad-science-journal-retracts-paper-hailed-by-proponents-of-homeopathy/?share=facebook
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/11/permeable-to-bad-science-journal-retracts-paper-hailed-by-proponents-of-homeopathy/?share=twitter
• https://retractionwatch.com/category/by-journal/scientific-reports/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/11/permeable-to-bad-science-journal-retracts-paper-hailed-by-proponents-of-homeopathy/#comments
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/10/study-of-a-nudge-to-use-hand-sanitizer-retracted/
• https://pixabay.com/users/Gadini-388416/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=818252
• https://pixabay.com/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=818252
• https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618761374
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/10/study-of-a-nudge-to-use-hand-sanitizer-retracted/#more-99138
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/10/study-of-a-nudge-to-use-hand-sanitizer-retracted/?share=email
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/10/study-of-a-nudge-to-use-hand-sanitizer-retracted/?share=facebook
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/10/study-of-a-nudge-to-use-hand-sanitizer-retracted/?share=twitter
• https://retractionwatch.com/category/by-subject/psychology-by-subject/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/10/study-of-a-nudge-to-use-hand-sanitizer-retracted/#comments
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/08/weekend-reads-dean-withdraws-from-post-after-retraction-of-lancet-book-review-star-researcher-committed-misconduct-journalism-investigation-leads-to-disclosures/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/03/researchers-retract-a-paper-because-it-turns-out-not-to-be-about-bullshit/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/04/our-current-approaches-are-not-working-time-to-make-misconduct-investigation-reports-public-says-integrity-expert/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/05/why-did-all-of-these-retractions-take-more-than-three-years/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/08/weekend-reads-dean-withdraws-from-post-after-retraction-of-lancet-book-review-star-researcher-committed-misconduct-journalism-investigation-leads-to-disclosures/#more-99500
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/08/weekend-reads-dean-withdraws-from-post-after-retraction-of-lancet-book-review-star-researcher-committed-misconduct-journalism-investigation-leads-to-disclosures/?share=email
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/08/weekend-reads-dean-withdraws-from-post-after-retraction-of-lancet-book-review-star-researcher-committed-misconduct-journalism-investigation-leads-to-disclosures/?share=facebook
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/08/weekend-reads-dean-withdraws-from-post-after-retraction-of-lancet-book-review-star-researcher-committed-misconduct-journalism-investigation-leads-to-disclosures/?share=twitter
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/08/weekend-reads-dean-withdraws-from-post-after-retraction-of-lancet-book-review-star-researcher-committed-misconduct-journalism-investigation-leads-to-disclosures/#comments
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/07/forensics-friday-whats-the-best-way-to-present-these-findings-in-a-figure/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/07/forensics-friday-whats-the-best-way-to-present-these-findings-in-a-figure/#more-99149
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/07/forensics-friday-whats-the-best-way-to-present-these-findings-in-a-figure/?share=email
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/07/forensics-friday-whats-the-best-way-to-present-these-findings-in-a-figure/?share=facebook
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/07/forensics-friday-whats-the-best-way-to-present-these-findings-in-a-figure/?share=twitter
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/07/forensics-friday-whats-the-best-way-to-present-these-findings-in-a-figure/#comments
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/06/chaos-as-chaos-retracts-paper-it-apparently-never-should-have-published-in-the-first-place/
• https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.5085661
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/06/chaos-as-chaos-retracts-paper-it-apparently-never-should-have-published-in-the-first-place/#more-98994
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/06/chaos-as-chaos-retracts-paper-it-apparently-never-should-have-published-in-the-first-place/?share=email
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/06/chaos-as-chaos-retracts-paper-it-apparently-never-should-have-published-in-the-first-place/?share=facebook
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/06/chaos-as-chaos-retracts-paper-it-apparently-never-should-have-published-in-the-first-place/?share=twitter
• https://retractionwatch.com/category/by-reason-for-retraction/faked-emails/
• https://retractionwatch.com/category/by-subject/physical-sciences-retractions/math-retractions/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/06/chaos-as-chaos-retracts-paper-it-apparently-never-should-have-published-in-the-first-place/#comments
• https://www.flickr.com/photos/andrewbain/525665435
• http://retractionwatch.com/2015/12/09/cancer-researcher-contributed-false-data-to-11-studies/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2016/10/20/researcher-pegged-for-misconduct-in-11-papers-earns-2nd-retraction/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/05/why-did-all-of-these-retractions-take-more-than-three-years/#more-98684
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/05/why-did-all-of-these-retractions-take-more-than-three-years/?share=email
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/05/why-did-all-of-these-retractions-take-more-than-three-years/?share=facebook
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/05/why-did-all-of-these-retractions-take-more-than-three-years/?share=twitter
• https://retractionwatch.com/category/by-reason-for-retraction/ori-investigations/
• https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/05/why-did-all-of-these-retractions-take-more-than-three-years/#comments
• https://retractionwatch.com/page/2/
• https://retractionwatch.com/page/478/
• https://wordpress.org/